.

This Week’s Council Meeting: Tears, Tension and an Empty Seat

A City Council meeting full of contentious issues left a clerk in tears and Planning Commissioner Mark Tiernan voted out of his position.

Tuesday night’s meeting of the Milpitas City Council was the City had seen in quite a while.

Undoubtedly one of the most controversial agenda items of the evening was when, in a move initiated by Mayor Jose Esteves that sparked an emotional debate amongst City staff and elected officials alike, Mark Tiernan was removed from his position on the Planning Commission.

The loss of Tiernan’s position came just days after in next year’s election.

There has been tension between Esteves and Tiernan for months, ever since a story, written by an anonymous political columnist known only as “The Fly,” appeared in Metro Silicon Valley newspaper and on website SanJoseInside.com on Aug. 17.

In the article, The Fly claimed that Tiernan had told him he believed the Mayor had instigated a “coup” back in July to keep him from being re-elected as chair of the Planning Commission. Tiernan when the former chair stepped down, and was up for re-election as chair in July, but The Fly alleged Tiernan told him he believed Mayor Esteves “strong-armed” other commissioners into instead.

In Tuesday night’s council meeting packet, Esteves explained his move by saying, “Commissioners should be held to a high standard with respect to accuracy of information given out,” and called Tiernan’s remarks in Metro “inappropriate.”

When Tuesday’s meeting began, and it came time to approve the agenda, Councilmember Debbie Giordano voted to have the item removed from the agenda, citing a technicality. Giordano had previously tried to remove the item from the agenda as well on Nov. 28 during a subcommittee meeting, stating the Mayor had not sufficiently explained his reasons for wanting Tiernan voted out. However, Mayor Esteves put the item back on the agenda for Tuesday night.

The council was required to vote on whether or not to remove the item from the agenda, but the move failed, 2-3, with Giordano and Vice-Mayor Pete McHugh voting for its removal, and Councilmembers Althea Polanski and Armando Gomez, as well as Mayor Esteves, voting to keep it on the schedule.

When the item came up on the agenda later in the evening, a tense debate on several sides followed.

Vice-Mayor McHugh started the discussion off in defense of Tiernan, citing his good attendance record at Planning Commission meetings, his previous service as chair of the commission, and his work in establishing and leading the Conditional Use Permit Streamlining subcommittee—which works to streamline the process for new businesses in Milpitas to open—as reasons he should be allowed to continue his term, which was due to end in December, 2012.

McHugh also brought up concerns about an e-mail he said he and several other councilmembers had received from Carmen Montano, a former councilmember and planning commissioner, claiming Mayor Esteves had indicated he wanted to appoint her as Tiernan’s replacement on the Planning Commission, and asking for their support in his doing so. The e-mail was dated Monday, a full 24 hours before the vote to remove Tiernan was scheduled to take place. Mayor Esteves denied speaking with Montano about the position.

“While this may not be technically illegal, I do not believe that it was ethical,” McHugh said in reference to Montano’s claim. “I am disappointed with the Mayor’s conduct.”

Wrapping up his remarks, McHugh said he thought the vote to remove Tiernan due to his remarks to Metro was “inappropriate for an isolated incident.”

Giordano followed McHugh with passionate remarks against the vote as well, saying it was unfair for the Mayor to work behind the scenes to try and get Tiernan ousted, while Tiernan himself remained clueless as to what was in the works.

“The Mayor has shown poor leadership. This is appalling,” she said, and indicated she would be voting against Tiernan’s removal.

The next to speak was Polanski.

“I’m torn,” she said, but indicated she agreed with Mayor Esteves that, because the Planning Commission is the most powerful of all City commissions, that those that serve on it should be held to a higher level of behavior and decorum.

Mayor Esteves spoke next.

“It’s my job to clean up,” he said. “There’s no room for conflict,” to which Giordano asked why Tiernan’s removal was just added to the agenda in November, considering the article was published in August. Esteves responded by saying he had been waiting for Tiernan to publicly correct his statements to Metro.

Giordano then asked why Commissioner Noella Tabladillo wasn’t also being removed, considering the article in Metro also quotes her as stating “Milpitas is not a third-world country,” and openly calling Tiernan a “self-absorbed a***ole.” Esteves said he planned to speak with her about the article later. Tabladillo’s term on the Planning Commission ends this month.

Councilmember Armando Gomez said, simply, planning commissioners should be held to a higher standard.

Then, Tiernan was given the opportunity to speak in his defense.

He started off by saying, “I am here because I criticized the mayor.”

Tiernan confirmed he had received a phone call while he was in Oregon from someone identifying himself as a reporter for Metro Silicon Valley asking about the vote that took place in July in which Mandal was elected chair of the Planning Commission instead of him.

At that time, Giordano asked him about his public argument with Tabladillo, which was quoted by The Fly.

“She was upset, she made a comment, and she later apologized to me for it,” Tiernan responded.

Tiernan then said he had apologized to the Mayor for his remarks in Metro, and claimed that what was actually printed in the article was “peppered with inaccuracies.” However, he did not point out any specific parts of the article in which he may have been misquoted.

At that time, Mayor Esteves made a motion to have Tiernan officially removed from his position on the Planning Commission. The motion was seconded by Polanski.

Giordano then made a last-ditch effort to once again stop the vote, again citing a technicality that Mayor Esteves had lumped the motion in with a discussion item over appointing new planning commissioners to replace those whose terms were expiring, which was not happening. However, City Attorney Mike Ogaz said the motion was fine as it was and could proceed.

In the end, Tiernan was removed by a 3-2 vote, with Giordano and McHugh dissenting.

The Council meeting was immediately adjourned following the vote, just before 11:30 p.m.

 

Additional reporting by Frank De Smidt.

In the interest of full disclosure, Milpitas Patch would like to point out that Frank De Smidt and Mark Tiernan serve together in the Milpitas Rotary Club.


Jennifer van der Kleut December 09, 2011 at 08:06 PM
William - we are looking into that, thank you. Trish - our only goal with this article was to report on what happened at this week's meeting and the reasons Mayor Esteves gave for asking that Mark Tiernan be removed. Thank you to both of you for reading Milpitas Patch.
Candance December 10, 2011 at 05:54 AM
William, I am with you. Why in the world would the City Council approve to restore the pay cut that was taken AND also a retroactive cost of living increase for 2.5 years for the City Manager? The City of Milpitas residents cannot afford any increase in salary. Does the elected City Council realize that 10.6% of the residents that they serve in Milpitas are unemployed? and Milpitas is the 4th highest in Silicon Valley with such a high unemployment rate? This item was on the consent list which means the council already approved this item in closed session and were going to attempt to pass it without any public discussion which concerns me greatly. This does not make financial sense to do this during the City's Budget crisis. 4.8 Million in employee concessions were made from the lower level city employees so the upper management can get cost of living raise is very disturbing to me, does this sounds familiar? Occupy Milpitas? I recently watched the City Council meeting online and I was appalled at what I watched. The people that we elected to represent our city act the way that they all did up in the dais made me wonder how anything gets done in Milpitas. One thing I did notice, a few times it was mentioned by the Council about cost savings of $150,000 by putting on the back burner,outsourcing our Police & Fire services, but if they want cost savings why would they approve a raise for the City Manager? It is not the time, if he wants a pay increase, then go to City of San Jose
George Maile December 10, 2011 at 06:05 PM
Thank you for bringing this up. It would be interesting to know how much the CM's base salary is, the dollar amount of the raise he is getting, and then throw in the total dollar amount the "retroactivity" element in this amendment grants him. Has Mr. Williams given an ultimatum that he would leave if he didn't get a raise? He surely earns more than most of the City employees already. Are we talking about hring freezes, etc., so we can afford to keep this City Manager?
William Cadwallader December 12, 2011 at 03:39 AM
I mistakenly thought that this amendment passed but it in fact got moved to the City Council Meeting in the beginning of January. Fortunately it was pulled from consent and must now be discussed publicly that night. Those are some very scary numbers Candance. It is definitely not the right time to give back (plus some extra) to one person when so many others who make less are looking at more cuts.
Candance December 12, 2011 at 07:14 AM
You are correct William, I watched the entire Council meeting and it only got pulled off the consent calendar due to lack of time. I for one plan on attending the meeting in January 2012 and probably all of the coming meetings to see how they are really spending our tax dollars. I hope that we can in the next month get the word out to the residents of Milpitas so we can show our unity and outrage that in our current budget crisis they would even consider a raise for any City employee. I agree that we have excellent services that we pay top dollar for but enough is enough. If the current City Manger is requesting a raise maybe we just can't afford him anymore and can find a qualified City Manager that does not mind keeping solidarity with all City employees that just had pay cuts.

Boards

More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »